Independents 4 Change Party

Very strongly agree

Yes

Independents 4 Change has historically positioned itself as a party that champions transparency, accountability, and the protection of human rights. Given their advocacy for these principles, it is highly likely they would strongly agree with passing laws to protect whistleblowers, as whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing wrongdoing and corruption, aligning with the party's core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Independents 4 Change is likely to agree with protecting whistleblowers with the caveat of not threatening national security, as this aligns with a balanced approach to transparency and security. This stance acknowledges the importance of whistleblowing in promoting accountability while also recognizing the legitimate concerns of national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Independents 4 Change might agree with the idea that whistleblowers should be protected when the information was legally obtained, as it aligns with legal norms and the rule of law. However, their strong stance on transparency and accountability suggests they might prefer less conditional support for whistleblowers, recognizing the complex circumstances under which whistleblowers operate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While Independents 4 Change might see the value in reducing sentences for whistleblowers as a step towards acknowledging their role, this position falls short of their likely preference for full protection and support of whistleblowers. Reducing sentences does not fully align with their advocacy for strong measures to ensure transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given Independents 4 Change's strong advocacy for transparency and accountability, it is highly unlikely they would agree with a stance that opposes the protection of whistleblowers. Protecting whistleblowers is integral to their mission of fostering a more open and just society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.