Should the government subsidize ride-sharing services for low-income individuals?

No, the government should increase public transportation infrastructure to make ride-sharing redundant.

Yes for now given the transport system in Ireland is not great. However, the government should expand the transit network and encourage low-income individuals to take transit instead once the transit has been built.

Yes, specifically buses. Ubers and whatever is fine and all, but it's still smaller than it needs to be. buses take up much less space, and use much less fuel per person, so they should have MAJOR investment, as well as trains. And for low income households it should be free to a certain cap. I think everyone should have a sort of 'Transportation Card' that tracks the supposed cost of all their rides, and just withdraws from your account at regular intervals, and for lower-income individuals or children there should be a certain yearly cap that does not need to be paid at all

i dont think there should be a subsidize ride sharing service for low income individuals, i think there should be more bus routes and public transport routes

Reduce student fares even further down and all public transport costs especially fares from counties eh Galway to Dublin : many Dublin drive back and forth

I agree that ride-sharing services should be available for low-income individuals and I agree that reducing traffic congestion is a problem that needs to be prioritized, but I am not in favour of the idea of reducing reliance on personal vehicles.

No the focus should be on public transportation like buses, subways and trains rather than private companies

no, increase funding for public transportation instead, and reform public transport in general

No, public transport systems should be revamped instead

Yes, but to regulate these services so that they can ensure safety

This would be extremely difficult to manage. A more effective strategy would be to provide better transport for people. A park and ride scheme to reduce traffic.

Should be subsidised for everyone inclusive of those who earn more

Yes but make ride sharing services partly accessible for the week to not abuse or eliminate public transport.

Should focus on improving public transport sector instead

This could be avoided by an investment in public transport

yes, but regulate these services to ensure that they are safe

They should just improve public transportation instead

If you mean a Bus then yes if you mean taxis small capacity vehicles no

Increase funding and availability of public transport, especially in rural areas

Public transport should be better funded and more readily available to people in rural communities.

Ride sharing where exactly, sort the public transport first

No. There should be more infrastructural focus on public transport across the country.

Yes but ride sharing should be a norm in Ireland for people of all backgrounds.

can we make the public transport in this country even 1% as good as most other european countries instead

No the cost of ride-sharing services should be reduced for everyone

No, the government should incentive moving away from cars entirely

no they should focus on making public transport both free and accessible for them

The government should be taxing massive corporations who do the most polluting instead of transferring the cost of climate change to ordinary working people

I believe this is a good idea but I don’t think it is worth the risk as it opens the door to many crimes such as theft, murder or kidnapping

No, invest in public transport infrastructure instead

what is classed as low income how is it going to be monitored

No, the government should focus on expanding public transport options to facilitate travel

With a bike to work scheme or once off hire purchase

The government should focus on improving public transport infrastructure

Yes but incentives should first be put in place to persuade people to take public transport

No, public transport should be expanded geographically and financially to aid communities

No, The state should provide free public transport

Well if they invested in public transport outside the major cities!!!

The government should instead be rolling out wider access to public transport instead of pumping more money into the likes of uber etc.

I think this seems like a good idea however could lead to problems such as theft, kidnapping, SA and others

No but public transport infrastructure should be improved to make the country more accessible for low income individuals

No, but the Government should subsidise public-trandport services for low-income individuals instead.

In areas under-serviced by reliable, timely public transport only

No, we should have a proper public transport system.

Public transport should be better funded and maintained instead.

If ride-sharing became cheaper for everyone, do you think it would make owning a car less important?

The repairs should low individuals overcome subsidiaries

Do you think supporting services like Uber and Lyft with public subsidies would help or harm the environment in the long run?

How would easier access to ride-sharing affect the daily life of someone without a vehicle?

How would affordable ride-sharing change your ability to move freely in your own city?

Do you think public money should be used to support services like Uber and Lyft, or is it better spent on public transit improvements?

How would affordable ride-sharing impact traffic congestion and your experience commuting during busy times?

If you had a choice between subsidized rides in an Uber or a stronger bus and train system, which would you choose and why?

Do you feel that increased reliance on ride-sharing services could weaken interest in improving public transportation systems?

What might be some unintended consequences of making ride-sharing cheaper for low-income individuals?