Should the EU impose a quota of migrants per country?

The EU should not dictate a sovereign state’s stance on immigration, it should be down to the Irish state

No, people should be able to direct a portion of their taxes toward immigrants who cannot sustain themselves. Quotas need to be based on these numbers.

Yes, but calculations and statistics should be used to spread out the amount of migrants in member states (eg, France is one of the largest and most developed states, and should take in more, while Hungary is one of the smallest and least developed states, and should take in less

Not when the country is already experiencing a housing crisis and cannot house our own citizens not to mind immigrants. It is unfair for everyone

No migrants in Ireland unless they decide to move here buy a house and contribute to society like the rest of us

There should be the appropriate infrastructure in place and how many accepted should align with this

I think there should be encouragement to take on migrants, and programs to help the process and help them integrate, but I am unsure if a quota is necessarily a good idea

I think as long as the right back up checks regarding the persons mental health, Crime and terrorism is checked and all is clear they should be allowed come.

Countries within the EU should be able to choose the amount of migrants they allow into their own countries

Yes, but it should be based off the percentage of the population to ensure every EU country houses their fair share

Even though I believe in Ireland taking in its fare share of migrants I believe the EU should be dispanded

Ireland should be able to control its own borders

Everyone should be allowed to come in. For Gods' sake did we not learn anything from the world wars?

The EU should have no say in each countries immigration policies, especially if those policies are damaging each country

Yes but it has to be realistic. The EU is almost fully saturated with migrants and the EU needs to accept that there is a point where all countries can no longer take anymore migrants, where financially, taking on more migrants will be detrimental to our own citizens

Different countries have different capacities on the number of migrants they can take. It's not a one size fits all and shouldn't be treated as such

Each country should be able to take in as many as they can accommodate with proper accommodations to ensure dignity for these people

Yes, we barley have enough housing, money, land to build or own things without 10,000 more people coming from abroad. Our children and family's deserve good things too.

Housing and welfare should be taken into account to ensure both migrants and residents are adequately cared for.

Ireland and Denmark have an opt out under the Lisbon treaty and should use it to refuse ukranians and asylum seekers who are flying in from safe countries .

No, it should be up to individual governments to decide on the quota that is acceptable for their own country

Yes, every EU country should have to take a minimum number of asylum seekers and refugees with no upper limit

I disagree with the EU holding control over a sovereign nation's border and immigration policies outside of EU members

Migrants should be able to come at any time, however the government should be able to process them efficently

Yes, and a limit.

According to the law in each country Eu would not be impose a quota of migrants per country

No, the EU should be deleted with no backup

No, Ireland should retain sovereignty over it's own immigration laws and introduce a points based system with deportations for law breakers, illegals even those who are first generation regardless of how long they've been here and those who overstay their visa.

No, and Ireland should leave the EU

No, but they should more or less be spread proportionately to host country population.

No, but it should set a quota for acceptance of applications

It should be based on a countries ability to accommodate them

the EU doesn't have a right to determine our decisions

No, however, every country within the EU should be required to share the burden of housing and caring for refugees. Countries within the EU should not be able to decline them when other EU countries are allowing them.

Yes, for economic migrants, not for asylum seekers

the eu as an entity should be abolished

Each EU member state has a responsibility to take Migrants as a result of several on going events in the Middle East, Sahel, etc., though a model would be needed to evenly distribute these individuals. Some examples would be a nations current economy, the state of their housing, their ability to integrate migrants successfully, etc., etc.

The EU should not dictate a countries immigration policy.

No that should be up to each individual country.

i’m unsure

Percentage of government alone is incorrect which it does to dies and end the rules when the gives ok with New Zealand and Australia Indian include hard sri Lanka attack budget

That depends. I'd have to see it first before i can say yes or no.

NO oppinion

No, Doing so would be destructive to the EU and potentially lead to it disbanding.

Yes, but have the quota be a number that is hard to max

Yes, but this quota needs to be balanced and high enough to welcome everyone

No, but it should give funding to countries based on migrant numbers taken in.

It should be up to the individual countries themselves

Depends on the size of the country and the state the housing market is in.

Depending on the which country it is , how rich it is, if it can house them, if it is safe for them.

Depending on how the country treats their own people - in the case of Ireland, its citizens are treated poorly. Those who are seeking a better life should not be subjected to living within direct provision for more than 8 years which is the case for some in Ireland.

No, the countries should make their own quotas.

I believe no in general but in some situations if a country barely has the resources to allow it’s own nationals to obtain their basic needs then there should be some form of quota .

This is an issue of sovereignty and it should be left to individual states

Under rare and extreme circumstances, quotas of migrants per country should be abolished

Based on financial situation and current population

We should always help people who need it

That needs to be under review because we need to reform this sector because we cannot have mass migrant crises & yes we do need migrants but it needs to be limited & legal or we don't do this at all

Yes, but it should be adjusted accordingly to how many migrants need a safe home

Yes but they should prove they are coming to work and add value to the community

There should be a minimum quota to make sure all countries are helping out as much as possible but it should be encouraged to accept more than the quota.

Yes, but only for refugees and with EU aid assistance.

Yes that will allow to control legal migrants into the UK

No, each country should be able to decide their own.

that needs to be debated & reviewed because all of those countries & their laws

Would you support a migrant quota if it meant aiding those in desperate need or escaping conflict?

How might your personal job prospects or education opportunities be influenced by an influx of migrants?

In what ways might a mandatory migrant quota challenge or enhance your community's values?

How would you feel if your country was required to accept a certain number of migrants every year?

How could the distribution of migrants across countries affect relationships between different nations?

How do you think a government should balance its responsibility to its citizens and to global humanitarian needs?

Could a migrant quota system affect your country's culture and social dynamics?

Is it fair for all countries to have a uniform migrant quota, regardless of their size or economy?

What do you think are the benefits and drawbacks of having a set number for migrant intake?

What are the moral implications of countries having to accept a certain number of migrants?