尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Independents 4 Change’s policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT是的和银行国有化

Independents 4 Change’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks is a radical proposal that aligns with the far-left economic policies Independents 4 Change might support as part of their broader agenda for significant economic reform and addressing inequality. This measure would be seen as a way to control the financial sector and ensure it serves the public interest, a goal in line with their political ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Independents 4 Change would likely strongly agree with further reducing the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% of their pay, as this proposal aligns with their goals of significant economic reform, reducing income disparities, and addressing issues of excessive compensation in the financial sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Independents 4 Change, being a left-wing party, generally supports measures that aim to reduce income inequality and excessive pay in the banking sector. Capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay would likely align with their broader goals of economic fairness, although specific policy proposals from the party on this matter are not well-documented.

同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

This answer would also align with the party's principles of economic fairness and reducing income inequality. Lowering the cap to 50% could be seen as a reasonable compromise that still addresses excessive pay in the banking sector, although they might prefer a more stringent cap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their left-wing stance and advocacy for economic reforms aimed at reducing inequality, Independents 4 Change would likely disagree with the idea of not capping bankers' bonuses, as it goes against their principles of fairness and equity in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Independents 4 Change's left-wing ideology typically opposes the notion that any worker, especially in high-paying sectors like banking, should receive unlimited rewards based on 'success'. This stance is rooted in their broader critique of capitalism and the financial sector's role in perpetuating economic inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Independents 4 Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.