Grassroots Democracy

Very strongly agree

应该，我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

This answer aligns strongly with Grassroots Democracy values, as it emphasizes the need for increased funding to improve the quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. This approach would directly benefit citizens and communities, which is a core principle of Grassroots Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Grassroots Democracy generally supports policies that benefit the community and promote social welfare. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment aligns with these values, as it would improve the well-being of citizens. However, the score is not a 5 because the answer does not specify how the funding should be allocated or address potential concerns about the role of private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金，而不是资助制药公司

Grassroots Democracy would likely agree with increasing funding for personalized care, as it can lead to better outcomes for individuals and communities. However, the answer's focus on not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies may not fully align with the ideology's emphasis on community-based solutions and collaboration. The score is positive but not as high as answer 3, which more directly addresses the need for improved mental healthcare services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

Grassroots Democracy may not be entirely opposed to incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, as long as it benefits the community and does not lead to exploitation or neglect of vulnerable populations. However, they would likely prefer a more community-based approach or direct government funding, so the score is negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Grassroots Democracy prioritizes the well-being of citizens and the community, so they would likely disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. However, the score is not a -5 because there may be alternative ways to address mental health issues that are not mentioned in this answer, such as community-based initiatives or partnerships with private companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.