+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 235 Whitestown voters.

86%
Yes
14%
No
66%
Yes
11%
No
13%
Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice
3%
No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support
7%
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 235 Whitestown voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 235 Whitestown voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Whitestown voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9YMTP93answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only if the there is no chance to survive or cannot thrive with their illness and goes through psychological examination to access if they fully understand and accept this choice

 @B373QTH answered…3mos3MO

All of the above, they should be certain that there's no survivability, examined so that they're fully aware of what's happening, and they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support, however this should NEVER be advertised to people who aren't definitely terminal

 @9ZT6RYSanswered…5mos5MO

No, because there may end up being pressure felt by terminally ill people to ease the ‘burden’ on their families and take assisted suicide

 @B57532Canswered…1wk1W

No but I do not believe in prosecuting close family members who have assisted a love one to die with dignity unless there is a genuine belief that there was no consent i.e. suspicion of murder.

 @9ZMGKRG answered…6mos6MO

Yes but only if there is absolute no chance of surviving their illness AND after a psychological evaluation understanding their choice

 @9YNJPRN answered…6mos6MO

Yea I think that after a psychological evaluation and proof that their quality of life will not be adequate they should be allowed to make this decision for themselves

 @9ZCDJ9Y answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only in a system where all care they could require to live comfortably is free so that it does not become the sole option for poorer people.

 @9ZCTZV6answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only after a psychological examination that shows they understand this choice and are making it for the right reasons. They should also have to wait for a certain period after their diagnosis before it's allowed, and they should only be able to do it if they will 100% die from this disease and nobody else, not even someone medically responsible for them should be allowed to make the choice for them. It should be a highly regulated process.