Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 422 Naas West voters.
55% Yes |
45% No |
55% Yes |
45% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 422 Naas West voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 422 Naas West voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Naas West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NLGS5L9mos9MO
Only in particularly serious national security situations
@9ZDW5P93mos3MO
Only if the person there investigating has done a major crime like human trafficking or drug trafficking
@9MMBKQN9mos9MO
Yes, but access should be restricted and justified
@9RHLPMZ7mos7MO
Yes, if you are a convicted. Murderer, mass drug trafficker and human trafficker, You should lose your right to autonomy.
@conorbruce 9mos9MO
It depends on the situation, it should be available but not free to use
@9ZLQVZH3mos3MO
No, but tech companies should be legally required to report suspicious activity to the government to ensure national security.
@9ZJVWP93mos3MO
This would be only if there was a genuine and grave risk and would have to be in accordance with law. Getting permission to do this in each instance can't just be a rubber stamping exercise. I don't see a need for this right now but recognize there could be circumstances where it's needed.
@9ZHHRQC3mos3MO
Yes, but as this implies government surveillance of the public, this should come with independent oversight to ensure that abuses of power don’t occur.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
