Restricting freedom of movement could mean tighter controls at borders to manage migration and security concerns. Proponents believe it’s necessary for national security, while opponents argue it undermines the fundamental EU principle of free movement and could harm the internal market.
Response rates from 2.4k Dublin voters.
53% Yes |
47% No |
53% Yes |
47% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Dublin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Dublin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Dublin voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NY8TH61yr1Y
Screening and behind the scene work should be done to a higher degree but it shouldnt be noticable on grounds
@B5G8RW62mos2MO
Yes, but only for EU member states that are classified as frontline states (eg, Italy, Spain, Greece)
@9ZT5D6P7mos7MO
I think people should be able to move here, if they have the means to provide for themselves and/or sponsorship from family, company etc
@9ZRX7FD7mos7MO
No, but every EU country should have stronger border security, as a means of safety for their people
@9ZHBZ8B8mos8MO
As long as it’s a vaild eu passport the person should be free to move
@9ZGSPPY8mos8MO
Yes, but everyone has a right to freedom just for the first year or two should be more restrictive.
@9NWX4CX1yr1Y
Yes, similar to Australia to protect what we have already and ensure those that integrate bring their culture but not their penchant for religious based aggression.
@9NSBV4S1yr1Y
Yes, nobody should be able to enter Ireland without passport checks
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Freedom of Movement” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
