Try the political quiz
+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 136 Dublin North-West voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 136 Dublin North-West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 136 Dublin North-West voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Dublin North-West voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B3KGCYTfrom Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

No, but the providers of the services should be allowed to send the information to the government if needed

 @B285GGXanswered…1yr1Y

If they are employed by the stae and its a work phone yes anything else you are going into dictorship

 @9ZHHRQCanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the option should be available in order to combat terrorism, but this should be done with independent oversight, and a warrant from a judge should be required in order to monitor a given individual from the public.

 @9ZGZHSManswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in extreme circumstances and must be approved by a judge and must be done so against a person suspected of a serious crime

 @9HM7ZJWanswered…2yrs2Y

They should not monitor phone call or emails. However, if a person has history of criminal activities and terrorism. They have lost their rights to privacy therefore, it should be monitored

 @8RLNYM8answered…5yrs5Y

No, because even if that could be useful in certain circumstances, it is too great of a risk if it falls into the wrong hands

 @8PCGVVKanswered…6yrs6Y

Yes but ONLY for those who may be involved in terrorism or crime. If no evidence can be found after a period of a month or two then all surveillance must be stopped at once.

 @8C5RDBVanswered…6yrs6Y

No, unless they have a court order and limited to individual persons suspected of a crime.