Independents 4 Change Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns closely with Independents 4 Change's advocacy for a more robust and well-funded public healthcare system. Their emphasis on the need for higher quality of care and services, especially in mental health, reflects their policy priorities and legislative efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Independents 4 Change has historically positioned itself as a party that advocates for increased investment in public services, including healthcare. Their support for enhanced funding in mental health research and treatment aligns with their broader commitment to improving public health infrastructure and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies

While Independents 4 Change would support the idea of increasing funding for personalized care in mental health services, their score is slightly lower here because the statement includes a caveat about not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. The party might not specifically oppose funding that benefits pharmaceuticals if it leads to improved patient care, but they would likely advocate for a balanced approach that doesn't overly favor corporate interests over patient needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead

Independents 4 Change generally opposes policies that prioritize privatization or market-based solutions for public services, including healthcare. They would likely disagree with incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, favoring direct government action and funding instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Given their progressive stance on healthcare and public services, Independents 4 Change would strongly disagree with the notion of not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. They have consistently advocated for more government intervention in healthcare to ensure equitable access for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.