@9SWMJY6

9>9  개인 답변임신 중절 합법화, 산아 제한, 성교육, 사회 복시 사업 확충을 통해 낙태 수를 줄일 수 있습니다

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예, 우리의 정신 건강 관리 시스템은 더 높은 수준의 보살핌과 서비스를 제공하기 위해 더 많은 자금이 필요합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변With the rising cost of affordability of housing this would then cause smaller landlords to go out of business, there should be property price caps implemented to prevent housing being sold off in bulk to private developers and vulture funds to feed corporate greed. Mom and pop properties have mortgages that need to be paid to ensure their own private pensions/

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예, 그러나 법원의 판결에 의해서만 행해져야 합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변네,하지만 양측이 독자적으로 압도적으로 찬성한다면

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예. 흉악 범죄, 폭력, 금융 범죄나 성범죄가 아니라면 괜찮습니다.

9>9  개인 답변예, 폭력을 위협하지 않는 한

9>9  개인 답변네, 하지만 누군가 마약 거래 탓에 사망했다는 증거가 있는 경우에만

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변I disagree with the EU holding control over a sovereign nation's border and immigration policies outside of EU members

9>9  개인 답변The Irish global carbon footprint is extremely small, outside of electricity generation it's arguably a net positive. I believe in Global warming and I don't disagree that setting an EU wide precedent with green/low carbon footprint the other nations (especially developing nations which rely heavily on fossil fuels to industrialize the economies on par with the 'west') the point is moot

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변There should be an EU wide national identity card to fast pass members within the common trade regions outside of that border checks should be enhanced.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변적게

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예. 그러나 그 정보를 공개해도 국가 안보에 위협되지 않는다면 그렇게 합니다

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변Yes but the NHS in the early noughties, the NHS and the HSE are on par with levels of bureaucracy taking the money away from the taxpayer. It should also be only available to those who are in receipt of consistent taxable income on par with being able to receive the Dole. You feed into the system so you can take out of it when you need to, not to abuse it.

9>9  개인 답변네,하지만 화장품은 아닙니다.

9>9  개인 답변Yes but also green energy is not the answer, the only way to do this is by introducing nuclear power in the interim to meet the demands of the grid without suffering brownouts while the sustainable solar/wind/tidal technology develops

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변더 보기

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변Yes and if this is the case then over the course of several years if the debt is high enough maybe the tax credits can be reduced provided the main lease holder or their children isn't in receipt of disability or chronic medical care.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요, 하지만 중독 예방 및 재활을 위한 재정은 늘려야 합니다

9>9  개인 답변네, 마약을 치사량까지 사용하는 겨애우를 줄일 수 있어 필요합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변팔레스타인

9>9  개인 답변아니오, 대신에 거대 다국적 기업에 대한 세금을 올려야 합니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요, 차별 행위를 저지른 학생에게만 해당됩니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요, 차별 행위를 저지른 직원에게만 해당됩니다.

9>9  개인 답변Let the people decide.

9>9  개인 답변Ask the farmer, he says yes. Ask the consumer they say no. It is cruel, but it's necessary.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변Vaping & Junk food are cheaper than alternatives especially for younger people. People need to eat and depending on the job don't have the time or energy to prepare a home cooked meal, vaping is cheaper than smoking so penalising those who use a less harmful method of getting something their body needs is the wrong way to view NRT (Nicotine Replacement Therapy)

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변Social Media companies act as a Speakers Corner, let any tosspot with two cents to throw allow them to do so. People with a larger following need to be under more scrutiny and social media companies are wising up to that like Twitter with "Community Notes" which are fact checked by independent agencies ensuring accurate information

9>9  개인 답변예,하지만 극한 상황에 대응하는 경우에만

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변줄여야 합니다, 기업들은 이 프로그램을 악용해서 월급을 줄이고 있습니다

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예, 그리고 마리화나를 법으로 금지하는 대신, 합법화 해서 세금을 부과하고 규제를 해야합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예, 그러나 유럽 연합의시민인 경우에만

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예, 하지만 징역과 가석방/ 보호관찰 기간을 다 끝마친 경우에 한정해야 합니다.

9>9  개인 답변It should be down to the business at the end of the day but our healthcare is public so allowing abuses of Health and Safety by those not caring shouldn't be allowed as it would literally cost the tax payer. I think businesses should be monitored but not in the sense of the morality but their community backing, a business that doesn't care about it's worker should be penalised but it's a slippery slope that would be difficult to manage.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변Electric vehicles are good for local pollution but add more demand to the electrical grid leading to more fossil fuel burning. Unless a drive is made towards making an EU wide nuclear electric grid the only potential alternative is using green energy to produce Hydrogen and introducing a drive towards Hydrogen power cars/buses/trains.

9>9  개인 답변감소

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변네, 하지만 범죄가 비폭력적일 경우에만 해당됩니다.

9>9  개인 답변네, 포장재나 식당 메뉴에 명확하게 표시되어 있다면 가능합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예, 무료 음식, 의복 및 의약품을 제공하기 위해 더 많은 소셜 프로그램을 만듭니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니, 캡처, 심문, 대신 그들을 투옥

9>9  개인 답변The scheme is for taxpayers of the nation and their families to better the nation. Why would you give money to people who don't feed into the system when there are thousands, even millions looking for a better life in their own neighbourhoods?

9>9  개인 답변예, 그러나 생산자들이 종자에 대한 특허권을 소유해서는 안됩니다.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변Ireland in particular needs to develop it's Navy and impose stricter conditions on the E.U. to prevent foreign fishermen depleting our own waters at the detriment to our own local fishing economies.

9>9  개인 답변아니오, 이미 "선거"라는 임기 제한이 있습니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예, 이렇게 하면 환자가 받는 잘못된 정보의 양이 줄어듭니다.

9>9  개인 답변증가

9>9  개인 답변예,하지만 다른 국가가 기부하는 금액에 비례합니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요, 범죄율이 높은 커뮤니티의 경찰서에 대한 자금 및 교육을 늘립니다.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변A centralized electric system or at the very least a dispersed one which picked up slack when needed especially if Nuclear would be ideal. The Irish government and citizenry doesn't have the knowledge or experience needed to operate a facility like this but however many needed spread across Europe would be ideal and argueably cheaper for the common man if a common fund was required for this.

9>9  개인 답변네, 하지만 매일 일정하게 사회 봉사를 해야만 합니다.

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니오, 그렇게 하는 사람을 존중하지는 않지만, 그들은 그렇게 할 수 있는 권리가 있어야 합니다.

9>9  개인 답변Within the common travel area the basis of all laws should be regarded in a shared cultural or linguistic basis. The basis of western morality is from our shared religion/morality and thus most of the laws translate but some don't. A consensus on the arguably archaic and cultural differences shouldn't necessarily be dismissed but should be given leeway to those who are not native but repeat offenders should be penalised.

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변The E.U. is not a nation and nation states should maintain their sovereignty and security, cooperation between EU countries in regards to policing i.e. Interpol is sufficient. The sharing of information should be freely offered but not to the detriment of ongoing investigations or potential military breaches

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변Only to remove 'imperfections' in genetics such as inheritable diseases. It shouldn't be used to 'perfect' humanity, only to remove 'imperfections'. Anything outside of it and it would easily be abused by militaries or other private entities to make "Übermensch"

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변아니요

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변Yes and no, like with all money it should have a trace to prevent corruption and illegal activity but at the same time it's not 'viewed' as money. Legislation needs to be drawn to finalize this

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변예

9>9  개인 답변아니요