경찰의 군사화는 법 집행관이 군사 장비와 전술을 사용하는 것을 말합니다. 여기에는 장갑차, 돌격 소총, 섬광탄 수류탄, 저격 소총 및 SWAT 팀의 사용이 포함됩니다. 지지자들은이 장비가 경찰관의 안전을 높이고 일반인과 다른 응급 처치를 더 잘 보호 할 수 있다고 주장합니다. 반대자들은 군사 장비를받은 경찰이 대중과 폭력적인 만남을 가질 가능성이 더 높다고 주장합니다.
@ISIDEWITH질문…1 주1W
In imagining a future society, would you see an increased or decreased use of military equipment by police, and why?
How do personal stories or news reports of police encounters influence your opinion on the militarization of the police?
If given the chance to vote on the extent of military equipment in your local police force, what factors would influence your decision?
How do you think the history of your community influences its stance on police using military-grade equipment?
Reflect on a time when you felt extremely safe or unsafe in your community; what role did the police play in that feeling?
What changes would you expect in your local community if the police department decided to no longer use military-grade equipment?
How might the depiction of police in movies and TV shows with military gear impact our views on real-life policing?
If a friend expressed fear of going to a protest because of heavily armed police, what advice would you give them?
Have you ever witnessed a police operation in your area that used high-tech equipment; what was your immediate reaction?
How would you feel if you saw a police officer patrolling your school with military-grade gear, and why?
@ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...4세4Y
아니요, 극한 상황은 전문 교육 및 장비를 갖춘 상급 기관에서 처리해야합니다.
아니, 경찰을 폐지
예, 그러나 장비 사용 방법과시기에 대한 엄격한 교육을받습니다.
예,하지만 극한 상황에 대응하는 경우에만
@8P6PWZP Louisiana 에서 답변됨…4세4Y
No, and abolish the police.
아니요
예
더 많은 답글 보기
