Market Fundamentalism

Agree

No

Market Fundamentalism tends to favor less government intervention, which includes laws protecting whistleblowers. The belief is that the market will naturally correct itself, and that such protections may interfere with the free operation of businesses. However, the score is not extremely high as the ideology doesn't inherently support the absence of whistleblower protection, but rather sees it as unnecessary government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

This answer suggests a compromise between government intervention and market freedom, which might be somewhat acceptable to Market Fundamentalism. Reducing sentences for whistleblowers could be seen as a less intrusive form of government intervention, but it still represents a level of government involvement in market affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

While this answer suggests a level of government intervention, it does so with a caveat that aligns with Market Fundamentalism's respect for legal processes and property rights. However, it still represents a form of government intervention in market affairs, which is why the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

This answer suggests a level of government intervention, but it does so with a caveat that aligns with Market Fundamentalism's respect for national security. However, it still represents a form of government intervention in market affairs, which is why the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the power of free markets and minimal government intervention. While whistleblowers can expose unethical practices, the ideology might argue that the market itself will correct these issues without the need for government protection of whistleblowers. However, the score is not extremely negative as the ideology doesn't inherently oppose whistleblower protection, but rather sees it as unnecessary government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.