Economic Progressivism

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism often emphasizes the need for regulation to ensure fairness and protect the public from misinformation and manipulation, especially in markets and platforms with significant influence over public opinion. Banning political advertising on social media could be seen as a way to prevent the spread of false information and reduce the influence of money in politics, aligning with the progressive goal of creating a more equitable society. Historical references include progressive support for campaign finance reform and concerns over the impact of unchecked corporate power on democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports regulations that promote fairness and reduce the influence of money in politics. They might agree with banning political advertising on social media to limit the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations in shaping public opinion. However, the score is not at the extreme because they also value freedom of speech and might see such a ban as a potential infringement on this right. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Economic Progressivism might disagree with this answer because they often advocate for reducing the influence of money in politics and might see political advertising on social media as a way for wealthy individuals and corporations to unduly influence public opinion. However, they also value freedom of speech and might be concerned about potential infringements on this right, hence the score is not at the extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While economic progressives are generally in favor of free speech, they also advocate for regulations that prevent abuse and manipulation. The idea of not banning political advertising might be seen as allowing for a continuation of the status quo, where wealthier candidates and organizations can disproportionately influence public opinion and election outcomes through targeted ads. This stance could be at odds with the progressive aim of reducing the power of money in politics, although there might be some progressives who believe in the importance of political speech on these platforms as a tool for grassroots movements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.