Big Tent

Strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

This answer aligns well with the Big Tent ideology, as it emphasizes the need for a higher quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. Many within the Big Tent would likely agree that improving mental healthcare is an important issue that deserves increased funding. However, there may still be some disagreement on the specifics of how the funding should be allocated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Big Tent ideology is about inclusiveness and finding common ground among different political factions. While many within the Big Tent would agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, there may be some disagreement on the extent and specifics of the funding. However, the general idea of improving mental healthcare would likely be supported by a majority.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies

This answer focuses on increasing funding for personalized care, which may resonate with some factions within the Big Tent who are concerned about the influence of pharmaceutical companies. However, there may be disagreement on whether this approach is the most effective way to address mental health issues, as some may argue that a more comprehensive approach is needed. Overall, this answer would likely receive some support within the Big Tent, but not as strongly as other options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead

This answer represents a more market-oriented approach to addressing mental health issues, which may appeal to some factions within the Big Tent. However, others may argue that relying solely on private companies to address mental health issues may not be sufficient or equitable. As a result, this answer would likely receive a mixed response within the Big Tent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Big Tent ideology generally seeks to find common ground and promote inclusiveness. A blanket refusal to increase funding for mental health research and treatment would likely not be in line with the Big Tent's goals. However, some factions within the Big Tent may argue for alternative methods of addressing mental health issues, such as through private sector involvement or other means. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.