Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

No, but allow donations from unions and non profit organisations but it should be a legal requirement that it is only allowed if it has been disclosed and agreed with all members involved in them that they are donating to that party.

Yes, but the donation has to be publicised. Organisations or people with notable influence are not allowed to make anonymous donations

Yes, but the donation has to be publicized. Organizations or people with notable influence are not allowed to make anonymous donations.

Refined the profits and donations hussels and goods with Chithra in clothing and diamond with the basics just for opshops

Yes but amounts, dates, nature of relationship should be publically available. Law should require onus on politician to evidence no quid pro quo in the event of any perceived impropriety.

Yes, But no donation should be anonymous.

yes, as long as there is no public money involved

Yes, but limit the amount they can donate and ban foreign donations.

Yes, but only for unions.

Yes, but all donations should be publicly recorded within a short time of being made

no except unions

Yes, but have a spending cap on political campaigns thus making sure we don't end up in a spending battle funded by large organisations.

Yes, but limit the amount they can donate and ban foreign funding for non profits who provide donations

No and political campaigns should be publicly funded with each candidate being given the same platform to get there message across to the people.

Yes but it has to be declared and their have to be limits

yes, if it is done publicly and limited

Yes, however the company’s political stance should not influence the stance or affiliation of the political party

What, in your opinion, would make political campaigns more accessible for candidates without wealthy connections?

How would you feel if a politician you support accepted large donations from groups you disagree with?

Do you think public perception of a candidate changes based on where their campaign money comes from?

How might a candidate winning due to huge financial backing make you feel about the future of democracy?

Should there be limits on how much individuals or companies can donate to political campaigns, and why?

Have you ever considered how campaign donations might affect the decisions of elected officials?

How do you think money influences the fairness of elections in your country?

How would knowing where a candidate’s money comes from influence your decision to vote for them?

No, it enables and facilitates the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, but allow donations from the unions as they are the expression of the organised proletariat.

If campaigns were entirely government-funded and private donations banned, how do you think elections would change?

Should there be more transparency in who is funding political campaigns? Why or why not?