Global warming, or climate change, is an increase in the earth's atmospheric temperature since the late nineteenth century. In politics, the debate over global warming is centered on whether this increase in temperature is due to greenhouse gas emissions or is the result of a natural pattern in the earth's temperature. In 2015 Alan Kelly, the minister for the Environment, published the Climate Action and Low Carbon Development Bill which outlined several goals that will make Ireland a “low carbon” economy by 2050. Opponents argue that strict laws on carbon emissions will have a severe effect on the Irish economy since many of the regulations will inflict heavy costs on the agricultural industry. Proponents argue that Ireland should join other developed countries and do its part to limit carbon emissions by 2020.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province:
County:
Region:
Barony:
@9DM9X3Q1yr1Y
Climate change doesn’t exist, left wing democracy uses it as a mass propaganda machine to control the population
@B2R487D4 days4D
This punishes businesses and is mean to do this to businesses. They don’t deserve to be punished for trying to invest in the country and they get punished. This is NOT okay to punish businesses for just not listening to governments.
@9ZV5PB32mos2MO
Yes, higher corporate tax for companies who have high carbon footprint and the responsibility of global warming shouldn't be put on to small business owners or consumers
@9ZT96BY 2mos2MO
Implement higher taxes for use of fossil fuels. Ensure they report on their carbon footprint yearly through ESG framework. Should implement carbon taxes on consumers of most electricity on the grid -datacentres
@9ZT2433People Before Profit2mos2MO
Target big business polluters. Leave small businesses alone as it can cause them to go out of business and have no income and be left with debts
@9ZSF2RR2mos2MO
No, public infrastructure projects should which reduce emissions should be the primary means of decarbonising the state.
@9ZRS45X2mos2MO
environmental regulations should be increased but there should be differences in the application on big corporations versus local businesses
Without China and India on board it seems like just another way to get taxes but obviously people, companies and states should be mindfully in ways to reduce co2
@9ZQ3JN8Independent3mos3MO
Yes, but take the scale and speed of regulations into account when considering the potential diminishment of direct foreign investments and local economies
Yes, but it should relative to the size and nature of the business eg. Data centres of multinational tech giants
Yes but only if they actually make sense. Incentives should be made to go towards environmentally better ways of working.
It depends on the size of the business, regulations are important but if enforced on a national level irrelevant to scale then could cause severe closures of small buisnness due to regulatory requirements and costs.
@9ZHKMZ63mos3MO
Larger more profitable businesses should face increased regulations. Smaller local business should receive incentives for alternative energy options
@9Z9753W3mos3MO
What's the point when some of the biggest polluting countries don't do anything and then we import their goods?
Yes i believe it is important to reduce carbon emissions but it most be done in a way that doesnt affect the business owners or taxes.
@9YM6ZZH3mos3MO
Yes but less on SMEs as they are already struggling with the costs of trading (minimum wage, overheads, etc)
@9SWMJY6Independent5mos5MO
The Irish global carbon footprint is extremely small, outside of electricity generation it's arguably a net positive. I believe in Global warming and I don't disagree that setting an EU wide precedent with green/low carbon footprint the other nations (especially developing nations which rely heavily on fossil fuels to industrialize the economies on par with the 'west') the point is moot
@9R6ZYBN7mos7MO
Yes, but be very very careful about what policies are added, as not to drive away businesses from the country, resulting in job loss.
@9MXWCGB9mos9MO
Yes but give a realistic timeline for conversion. And provide more incentives for alternative energy production.
@9K486Y812mos12MO
I believe regulations should be within reason, unlike the growing number of unrealistics regulations.
@9T937DD5mos5MO
Yes, because is danger Increasing ocean acidisation, sea level rise, more frequent and intense storms
@97YN924Fianna Fáil2yrs2Y
More insentives for green enegery. The farmers can't bear all the burden hedgerows need included in co2 emissions counts. Expand rail not roads.
Yes, and provide relief for smaller family run business and increase pressure on chain franchises
No, our country is too small and does not make as much of a footprint as other countries
@8TRGSX24yrs4Y
Doesn't matter the EU will dictate what we have to do.
@8TP9BD24yrs4Y
We should criticize China more for their lack of environmental regulation
Yes, I believe global warming is a natural occurance but I also believe that our carbon emissions should be reduced to help the planet survive in the long run.
@8RWRYNM4yrs4Y
Big corporations should have more environmental regulations but SME's should be excluded from this
@8RRCQK54yrs4Y
yes but only for larger buisness
@8PFH4YX4yrs4Y
As long if there is an alternative then yes
@8JMQMQK4yrs4Y
Ye able to add some kind of change by not full on
Only if they are willing to contribute to the additional costs of the change
Yes, on the large corporations and industrial scale pollutors, not on small businesses
@9C5MSX7Independent2yrs2Y
I think the government should make it more affordable for buissneses to be envoirmentaly friendly
@9BJNKFB2yrs2Y
No, carbon dioxide is the gas of life. Regulations on packaging and pollution into water and land are vital and not enough. Other harmful emissions into the air from chemical factories need to exist eg to denature chemicals should be a basic regulation. Carbon passports are based on a lie and hypocrites tyrannically driving policies to control humans for anti human agenda
@99QKTNR2yrs2Y
Nope Nuclear Energy could be an alternative
@993JGGK2yrs2Y
I would say yes if ideal and would not raise demand but diminish supply
@98H3FLL2yrs2Y
Tax carbon emissions instead
@98DWMMM2yrs2Y
Yes but it depends on the regulations.
@8RLNYM84yrs4Y
Yes, and we should rethink our production/consumption model so that we make sure to decrease carbon emissions
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.