Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies
@9Z9LJHD4mos4MO
It’s none of the governments business the government shouldn’t have the ability to control a persons money in any way
@9ZD5FTC3mos3MO
The government should only be able to monitor bank accounts/wallets once there’s confirmed suspicious transactions
@9ZVTW4Q3mos3MO
Government should not have the authority to monitor your money. People are earning the money not the Government, the Government needs an efficiency department and leave money with the people that earn it
@9ZTB7LY3mos3MO
They should be allowed to store their money there but the government shouldnt be able to even monitor it
@9ZG8PZL3mos3MO
They can secure their money but if there's significant movement of money they should be put under robust Anti Money laundering measures
@9Z979SP4mos4MO
This question is somewhere in the annoying middle ground that frustrates me re: cryptocurrency because fine, it's not technically wrong to do this. I am however dubious of the lack of accountability baked into cryptocurrencies, and I do not trust anyone with a stake in maintaining any such wallet.
The government should not be able to monitor it but you should be allowed to secure money in a self-hosted digital wallets
@9ZGSPPY3mos3MO
The government even monitoring your money seems like you loose a bit of freedom with your own life very unsure about this question
@9N8W92L9mos9MO
Only in the case of a number of suspicious transactions. Limited access but access only to banks who can only see the frequency
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@9ZGLBG63mos3MO
It should be monitored but controlled only if they produce way too much money, keeping the person in balance with other people in terms of money
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.