Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
No
@9YLTLKK3mos3MO
5 people on a bus/in a car is better for the environment and traffic than five people in five different cars.
@9Z9B9Y43mos3MO
Yes we need more subsidies for sharing transport or public transport far to many private cars
@9NMXF5K8mos8MO
No, The state should provide free public transport
@9NF9SYP8mos8MO
Yes and no. Deregulate the Taxi industry. Don't require a license for transport services as an example.
@9ZDPDMNPBB Solidarity3mos3MO
No, the government should provide suitable public transport to the point where driving is not a necessity
@9ZCH33G3mos3MO
Yes but the priority should be working towards free, accessible public transport and reducing commercial emissions
@9ZB7NX63mos3MO
again, carpooling is a distraction, investment should be focused on decreasing private vehicle use in urban areas, and increasing public transport nation-wide
@9QC6Y9M7mos7MO
These incentives are manifest, the sharing of fuel costs for instance. Instead, there should be disincentives to not sharing transport.
@9T3JZLQ5mos5MO
The repairs should provide services as incentive shared
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
