Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

No

Yes but funding for mitigation strategies should be prioritised

Yes, if it is proven that a result could be achieved, then decision then could be made to implement it

It would be good but there are more urgent matters to attend to such as housing crisis, homeless crisis

Absolutely not! Also, planes and airline companies flying over our airspace should be inspected and their fuel and exhaust/CONTRAILS they leave in/over irish airspace, independently tested for anything other than by-product of engine combustion. Geoengineering happening in our sky's, but destined to effect weather in other countries, still effects our well-being, mentally, and agriculturally by changing our sunlight and skies

No, as we should focus more on understanding the processes before investing in engineering strategies.

Yes, but only processes/interventions that can be reversed or are not permanent should be allowed eg. Cloud seeding only when required to treat drought conditions or CO2 removal through something such as digital trees

Yes, so that if needed there are other options for fighting climate change aside from cutting emissions.

Yes, but it should remain at a research stage until a full public consenus is reached

Yes, given that proper research is conducted in order to evaluate the currently unknown effects

Yes, but vary it based on how well the research is going, and allow funding to be pulled at any time

Yes, after more research into the possible impacts of geoengineering

No, research has shown we are better at focusing on mitigation and adaptation to climate change

Only if it refuses to put any effort in anywhere else

What would you say to someone who believes humans are responsible for fixing every problem we caused, even if the solutions may be dangerous?

How much do you trust science to solve big environmental problems like climate change, and why?

If you could control the weather for a day, what changes would you make and why?

Do you think humans should intervene in nature's processes to prevent further climate change, or should we focus solely on reducing emissions?

How would you react if your favorite natural landscape was altered by a scientific solution meant to stabilize the climate?

How would you feel if a sudden change in technology could instantly cool the planet but had unknown risks?

What role do you think future generations should play in deciding the solutions to climate change we use today?

Would knowing that geoengineering could affect countries differently change how you feel about it?

In your opinion, should humanity take risks to drastically fix the environment, or should we tread carefully with small steps?

Do you think altering Earth’s climate systems is ethical if it slows down global warming but disturbs ecosystems?