Try the political quiz

2 Replies

 @8XTJ34Canswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but we do not need a powerplant in our country, it's a waste of resources

 @8WTS8PCanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8TN5LKBanswered…3yrs3Y

Only under intense regulation and management. But as an interim energy source while implementing renewables.

 @8RLNYM8answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, nationalise the industry, and invest in research to make sure we find a cleaner or even a more efficient way. And fast if possible.

 @8R3BWG2answered…3yrs3Y

 @9K633W4Fine Gaelanswered…2mos2MO

Not in Ireland, but support France's use. I don't think it's suitable for Ireland, given the size of the country and proximity to the gulf stream.

 @9K46XLQanswered…2mos2MO

i support the research but the inefficiencies and waste nuclear products that are produced force me to side against current energy.

 @9FY3BMBSinn Féinanswered…7mos7MO

If nuclear fusion is discovered to be viable to use for electricity absolutely but we must explore other alternatives first.

 @9F2CKNYanswered…8mos8MO

Yes, Nuclear power reactors do not produce direct carbon dioxide emissions so it helps the environment, nuclear power would help deliver energy at more affordable prices and Ireland is safe when it come to earthquakes, hurricanes , tsunamis, natural disasters that can create disasters.

 @9CLVJDGFine Gaelanswered…10mos10MO

Yes, as long as appropriate safety mechanisms are in place to prevent disasters

 @9C4LDG5Sinn Féinanswered…11mos11MO

Yes , however I think the government should look into thorium as opposed to uranium and molten salt reactors

 @99V72GYanswered…1yr1Y

The reason I can afford is the increase of geothermal and delivery the right people new Zealand and Australian Japan Pacific with water waste teams of councils

 @99RBNJTanswered…1yr1Y

This is a difficult question. Nuclear power has positives and negatives.

 @98R7BS4answered…1yr1Y

 @98D54YLanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, as long as its done as safe as possible and waste is disposed of correctly

 @97TK387answered…1yr1Y

When nuclear fission becomes possible and safe then yes, but the danger of the spent fuel rods is far too high, and we should invest in more renewable forms of energy.

 @96CRGWHanswered…2yrs2Y

 @93RH8NGfrom Osaka commented…2yrs2Y

Yes. It's less dangerous than coal, oil or gas. It may be too difficult at our scale, but as a European venture, any increase in non-renewable energy should be nuclear.

 @938F75CFine Gaelanswered…2yrs2Y

Maritime based wind power should be used directly to generate hydrogen, which is stored adjacent to land-based power stations and burned as required.

 @8ZP8PFFSocial Democratsanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and more funding should be invested into new reactor designs that can extract more energy out of new nuclear pellets and reuse spent nuclear pellets.

 @8Z2BNQ8answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but it has to be a very well thought out system with essentially no risk to public safety. No cost can be spared on public safety. Small scale modular reactors may offer this opportunity.

 @8YYYXXKIndependentanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in the instance where costs are considerably cheaper that cleaner renewable sources.

 @8PNL63Yanswered…3yrs3Y

I support importing nuclear energy from France, but Ireland is too small and doesn't have the expertise to efficiently provide its own nuclear energy.

 @8J2LNT2answered…4yrs4Y

We need a clean air act which would allow more funding into leaner renewable alternatives with subsidies

 @8DQ9ZDZanswered…4yrs4Y

yes, however its cheaper and quicker to invest and nationalize other alternatives eg wind and solar

 @8XR8DQ2answered…2yrs2Y

Yes. Nuclear energy isn't like what it's portayed as. Its infinitely safer than goal and gas energy.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...