Identity and Democracy Party

Agree

No

Given their nationalist stance, the Identity and Democracy Party is likely to agree with restricting voting rights to residents within the country to ensure that the national electoral process is determined by those directly subject to its outcomes. This perspective aligns with a broader nationalist agenda that prioritizes the interests and decisions of the current residents over those who have chosen to live abroad, reflecting a commitment to national sovereignty and the immediate community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for citizens living in Northern Ireland

The Identity and Democracy Party might be slightly more open to this idea due to the unique historical and political context of Northern Ireland, recognizing the complex identity and citizenship issues arising from the Good Friday Agreement. However, their general stance on national sovereignty and skepticism towards extending voting rights broadly would still make them cautious about fully endorsing this policy without reservations, reflecting a nuanced position that considers geopolitical sensitivities while adhering to nationalist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only within the first five years of living abroad

While this position offers a compromise by allowing some citizens living abroad to vote, the Identity and Democracy Party might view the five-year limit as arbitrary and still too lenient, potentially undermining national sovereignty. However, they might see it as a more acceptable stance than unlimited voting rights for all citizens abroad, as it attempts to balance the rights of citizens living abroad with the principle of maintaining a strong connection to the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Identity and Democracy Party, being a right-wing, nationalist, and Eurosceptic political group in the European Parliament, generally prioritizes national sovereignty and may view the extension of voting rights to citizens living abroad as diluting the national identity and influence within its own borders. Historically, nationalist and right-wing parties have been more cautious about extending voting rights beyond their immediate national borders, emphasizing the importance of those residing within the country in determining its political future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.