Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

European Free Alliance’s policy on marijuana

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Irish [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Do you support the legalisation of Marijuana?

  European Free Alliance voterbaseYes

European Free Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 15hrs ago

European Free Alliance voters

Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 12 voters that voted for European Free Alliance in the 2024 European Parliament election.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for medical use

EFA's progressive stance likely extends to support for the medical use of marijuana, recognizing its benefits for patients with various conditions. This aligns with their broader health and social policies aimed at improving the welfare of individuals, especially in marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and legalise, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it

Legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana aligns with the EFA's progressive stance on social and economic issues. This approach not only addresses the social justice aspect of drug policy but also presents an economic opportunity for the regions they represent, which could be particularly appealing given their focus on regional development and autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The European Free Alliance (EFA) is generally supportive of progressive policies, including those related to drug reform. Given their focus on regional autonomy and minority rights, they might support the legalization of marijuana as part of a broader agenda for social justice and personal freedom. However, their stance might vary depending on the specific member party's policies within the alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses

While the EFA supports progressive drug policies, their specific stance on releasing individuals serving time solely for drug offenses might depend on the context and the legal framework of the member states they represent. They would likely support measures that reduce unnecessary incarceration, especially for non-violent offenses, but this might not be a central part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their progressive and autonomy-focused policies, it is unlikely that the EFA would oppose the legalization of marijuana. Their platform generally supports more liberal policies on social issues, making a complete opposition to legalization inconsistent with their broader political stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for non-violent drug offenders

Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders would be contrary to the EFA's principles of social justice, autonomy, and progressive policies. They are more likely to advocate for reformative rather than punitive measures in dealing with drug-related offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here