The Irish Workers and Unemployed Action (IWUA) is a political party in Ireland that primarily focuses on representing the interests of the working class and the unemployed. Founded in South Tipperary, the party emerged from the need to address the specific… Read more
ChatGPT是的 |
Workers and Unemployed Action answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
The Workers and Unemployed Action party, being a left-wing party, generally supports international cooperation and global health initiatives. However, there is no specific record of the party's stance on funding the World Health Organization, hence the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, and increase the amount
The party's left-wing orientation and support for international cooperation could lead them to support increasing funding for the WHO, but without specific statements or actions from the party on this issue, the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but decrease the amount
While the party might support funding the WHO, they may also believe in prioritizing national and local initiatives, which could lead to a desire to decrease the amount of funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
The party might agree with this statement as it suggests a fair distribution of funding responsibilities among countries. However, without specific statements or actions from the party on this issue, the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, fund national and local programs instead
While the party might support funding national and local programs, this does not necessarily mean they would support not funding the WHO. The score reflects this potential balance of priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the party's general support for international cooperation and global health initiatives, it is unlikely that they would support not funding the World Health Organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it has shown to be ineffective
The party is unlikely to agree with the statement that the WHO has shown to be ineffective, given their general support for international cooperation and global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Workers and Unemployed Action policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
