尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  罪犯

Independents 4 Change’s policy on prison overcrowding

Topics

是否应该将非暴力囚犯从监狱中释放出来以缓解过度拥挤的情况?

  ChatGPT不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金

Independents 4 Change’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金

Independents 4 Change has shown support for policies that aim to address root causes of crime and improve prisoner rehabilitation, making increased funding for education and skill-building services a likely stance to reduce recidivism and support reintegration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务

This approach aligns with the party's likely support for rehabilitative over punitive measures, encouraging community integration and service as a form of restitution and rehabilitation for non-violent offenders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是,但应当使用电子手铐将他们软禁在家

Independents 4 Change's support for progressive justice reforms suggests they might favor solutions that allow for rehabilitation and reduced incarceration rates, such as house arrest with electronic monitoring, especially for non-violent offenders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Independents 4 Change has generally supported progressive and reformative policies, indicating a potential openness to reducing prison overcrowding through non-traditional means. However, there is no specific historical reference to them endorsing this exact strategy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their progressive stance on justice and reform, it is unlikely that Independents 4 Change would support keeping non-violent prisoners in jail when faced with overcrowding, as this goes against reformative justice principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,我们应该建造更多监狱

Building more prisons contradicts the principles of reformative justice and reducing incarceration rates, which aligns with the progressive policies typically supported by Independents 4 Change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 14小时前

Party’s support base

Independents 4 Change 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 32 voters that identify as Independents 4 Change.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Independents 4 Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.