가족주의

동의하다

예

Familialism, which prioritizes family values and the well-being of the family unit within society, might support a permanent ceasefire in Gaza to the extent that it would lead to increased safety, stability, and well-being for families in the region. The ideology would likely see the cessation of hostilities as a means to protect family units from the adverse effects of conflict, including loss of life, displacement, and trauma. However, the support might not be absolute (hence not a full score of 5) because familialism does not inherently prioritize political solutions or strategies, but rather the outcomes that best serve the family unit's interests. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

동의하지 않는다

아니요

While familialism focuses on the welfare of the family unit, it does not inherently oppose political or military actions. However, opposing a permanent ceasefire in Gaza might be seen as contrary to the interests of family stability and safety. The negative score reflects the tension between the ideology's primary focus on family well-being and the potential harm that continued conflict could inflict on families. Nonetheless, the score is not at the extreme end (-5) because familialism might also consider factors such as long-term security and the protection of family units from future conflicts, which could, in some interpretations, justify opposition to a ceasefire if it is believed not to offer a lasting solution. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.