Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

Yes

The government should not impose a blanket ban on cross-border payment methods, as this would restrict legitimate humanitarian and family support. However, strict enforcement of existing sanctions and targeted restrictions on illegal or prohibited transactions should be maintained.

If they earn their money by working they should be allowed do as they please but if taking government money to send home should be stopped

Large or suspiciously frequent transactions should be flagged and investigated to ensure that payments or not going towards the funding of criminal activity but smaller sums or transactions confirmed to be towards humanitarian aid should not be restricted

Not ban, but regulate. Reasonable amounts set from person to person should be allowed, for example if used to provide humanitarian aid, but large amounts between organisations, etc for possible criminal activity etc. should be prevented.

No, OFAC is western imperialism and should be removed.

Yes, if it's includes countries sponsoring wars like Israel, and european countries known for tax-evasion

Government should be able to identify citizens using these payment methods to circumvent sanctions and act appropriately

I belive people should have the right to send money to whoever they want as that is the right of every individual

35 percent should kept by the government and if it is a high risk country there sending it to it should be 60 percent

Absolutely not. These countries' general citizens have nothing to do with the conflicts. Most people in all of those places are good people, so as long as it is known that it is going to positive places and not specifically funding their government, there should be no banning in the slightest

No but have very strict regulations in place regarding the transfer of money to these regions ie the national identity of the recipient, the rationale for sending, limits on amount that can be sent (to take into account countries like Palestine)

If people want to do it keep it strongly regulated to avoid money laundering. If proven impossible it should be banned

Countries where we are seeing high level vision of abuse of power should be put on surveillance with this exchange

No, unless it’s untraceable such as through digital or crypto currencies. The ability to send cross border payments via account or funds transfers should be maintained.

No, but a system should be put in place to ensure it is not sent to organisations that are classed as oppressive or terrorists, according to the UN, EU NATO etc.

Yes and no, like with all money it should have a trace to prevent corruption and illegal activity but at the same time it's not 'viewed' as money. Legislation needs to be drawn to finalize this

If avoiding banks to transfer no problem but i wouldn't like to see some of those transfers creating harm by transferring to certain states. Crypto is ok as long as you are a citizen.

Only some countries and those abusing the system regardless of where they're from

No, if the government is to sanction countries, it should be based on EU guidelines, and not a US treasury department

People should be able to support family members but a cap should be applied.

Lol. The government coukd never accomplish enforcing this. This is a pioedream.

It should only apply if it applies in other countries

While I understand why this is done, I feel like it can have an adverse effect on the people who really need it, in a humanitarian effort. Sometimes this is the only means for people to get out of war-torn areas. I feel that it's punishing the people more so than the government. It would be more beneficial not send arms over to these countries, etc.

I think large amounts should be tracked and traced but small amounts are usually family or basic needs or even paying back a friend that helped you at one point, definitely 50/50

There is a big difference between sending money to a palestinian citizen and a russian one for me. It shouldnt be banned but it should most definitely be monitored.

Yes but Only if it's russia, Iran and north Korea. They can only send money to Venezuela if it can be proven they've no links to any government apparatus

I don't think it should be banned but stricter control and regulation should be implemented if sending money to these countries

there should be a low cap on the amount allowed to be paid depending on which countries you’re sending the money to

Only if the list of prohibited destination countries is decided by the Irish State, not by an external organisation.

How would you feel if international sanctions meant you couldn’t financially support family members in another country, even during a crisis?

How do you balance the need for national security with the ability for families to stay financially connected in countries under sanctions?

Do you think preventing cross-border payments because of security concerns outweighs the personal needs of individuals who are in difficult situations?

Can technology like cryptocurrency really solve the struggles people face with traditional banks when transferring money internationally?

Do you believe there should be exceptions to financial restrictions when humanitarian aid is at stake, or are these rules too important to bend?

Do you think being able to send money across borders without using banks gives more freedom to the average person, or does it create more risks?

In your opinion, should governments restrict financial transactions with certain countries if it affects innocent people trying to survive?

Have you ever thought about how international money transfers impact people’s freedom to help loved ones across borders?

How do you think cross-border payment systems should prioritize human rights while still respecting international laws and sanctions?

Is bypassing government restrictions with cryptocurrencies a form of fighting for personal freedom, or does it create new dangers?