Try the political quiz

32 Replies

 @9ZWFB36answered…3mos3MO

It is sad that I almost feel we should, solely based on the fact that many other countries are doing so. But I still say definitely not. I think we should be a better example to other proposed 'powerful' countries to let go of such damaging and mistrusting methods

 @9ZVHFZGanswered…3mos3MO

The investment should be regulated in order for it not to be abused and put a bad use. There’s a pro on a con to everything you do.

 @9ZVCM3Manswered…3mos3MO

I think it is important to stay abreast of new technologies and make use of them in anyway that benefits the country.

 @9ZVBJZ7answered…3mos3MO

I believe the government should invest in ai in some way partially, only ever as an information gathering and relaying tool to be observed by a human overseer but remaining neutral should be in our agendas which should include allocation of funds

 @9ZTX542answered…3mos3MO

As long as defence is not solely reliant on AI work. Situations heavily require a human touch as well

 @9ZTNNHQanswered…3mos3MO

Not for everything, especially schools. It can allow for children to not use their brains to their full ability. It also has the potential to take jobs from people.

 @9ZSDYQJanswered…3mos3MO

I believe the government should invest in ai in some way but remaining neutral should be in our agendas which should include allocation of funds

 @9ZMXPBJPeople Before Profitanswered…4mos4MO

Yes, but it should be heavily regulated and slowly implemented, and not be used in critical situations. Should be used to make mundane

 @9ZMH2PZSinn Féinanswered…4mos4MO

I think it should but should be more advanced because AI can still make a mistake and could identify the wrong person.

 @9ZKXN9Wanswered…4mos4MO

partially, only ever as an information gathering and relaying tool to be observed by a human overseer

 @9ZD76XN answered…4mos4MO

Yes but heavily controlled by humans to help prevent any negative or unethical consequences

 @9Z979SPanswered…4mos4MO

No and a computer can never be held accountable, therefore never place a computer in an accountable position

 @9YJZG96from Illinois  answered…4mos4MO

 @9XRVKFManswered…4mos4MO

 @9NWX4CXanswered…9mos9MO

Yes but only for calculations and tine scale reasons. It should not be allowed to develop an arsenal.

 @9NLGS5LSinn Féinanswered…9mos9MO

Some investment once it has become more reliable. Not at the expense of existing methods.

 @9NL6358Labouranswered…9mos9MO

 @9NKQKSGanswered…9mos9MO

 @9MMCJ9FFine Gaelanswered…10mos10MO

To a degree yes, but effectively and with full understanding of what they are asking Ai to do and the potential outcomes to be considered

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If AI systems are used for cyber defense, do you believe they can truly keep up with human hackers or outmaneuver them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What are your thoughts on who should be held responsible if an AI system makes a mistake that results in the loss of lives during a conflict?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think AI could help prevent wars from happening or will it just escalate arms races between countries?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What worries you more: nations not adopting AI fast enough in defense or developing AI too quickly without enough oversight?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Could you trust a machine to defend your country, or does that responsibility need to stay with humans no matter what?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you think the use of AI in national defense aligns with our values around human rights and justice?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Could AI in military strategies one day reduce human casualties or will it simply lead to more advanced forms of warfare?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do you personally feel about the idea of autonomous drones deciding whether to engage in combat without human input?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How might AI in defense change the way governments and soldiers view the concept of 'sacrifice' in war, and is that a good thing?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Do you think letting machines make life-and-death decisions in military conflicts is a necessary step forward or does it cross an ethical line?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...