Try the political quiz

32 Replies

 @9ZWFB36answered…1mo1MO

It is sad that I almost feel we should, solely based on the fact that many other countries are doing so. But I still say definitely not. I think we should be a better example to other proposed 'powerful' countries to let go of such damaging and mistrusting methods

 @9ZVHFZGanswered…1mo1MO

The investment should be regulated in order for it not to be abused and put a bad use. There’s a pro on a con to everything you do.

 @9ZVCM3Manswered…1mo1MO

I think it is important to stay abreast of new technologies and make use of them in anyway that benefits the country.

 @9ZVBJZ7answered…1mo1MO

I believe the government should invest in ai in some way partially, only ever as an information gathering and relaying tool to be observed by a human overseer but remaining neutral should be in our agendas which should include allocation of funds

 @9ZTX542answered…1mo1MO

As long as defence is not solely reliant on AI work. Situations heavily require a human touch as well

 @9ZTNNHQanswered…1mo1MO

Not for everything, especially schools. It can allow for children to not use their brains to their full ability. It also has the potential to take jobs from people.

 @9ZSDYQJanswered…2mos2MO

I believe the government should invest in ai in some way but remaining neutral should be in our agendas which should include allocation of funds

 @9ZMXPBJPeople Before Profitanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, but it should be heavily regulated and slowly implemented, and not be used in critical situations. Should be used to make mundane

 @9ZMH2PZSinn Féinanswered…2mos2MO

I think it should but should be more advanced because AI can still make a mistake and could identify the wrong person.

 @9ZKXN9Wanswered…2mos2MO

partially, only ever as an information gathering and relaying tool to be observed by a human overseer

 @9ZD76XN answered…2mos2MO

Yes but heavily controlled by humans to help prevent any negative or unethical consequences

 @9Z979SPanswered…2mos2MO

No and a computer can never be held accountable, therefore never place a computer in an accountable position

 @9YJZG96from Illinois  answered…2mos2MO

 @9XRVKFManswered…2mos2MO

 @9NWX4CXanswered…7mos7MO

Yes but only for calculations and tine scale reasons. It should not be allowed to develop an arsenal.

 @9NLGS5LSinn Féinanswered…7mos7MO

Some investment once it has become more reliable. Not at the expense of existing methods.

 @9NL6358Labouranswered…7mos7MO

 @9NKQKSGanswered…7mos7MO

 @9MMCJ9FFine Gaelanswered…8mos8MO

To a degree yes, but effectively and with full understanding of what they are asking Ai to do and the potential outcomes to be considered

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

If AI systems are used for cyber defense, do you believe they can truly keep up with human hackers or outmaneuver them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What are your thoughts on who should be held responsible if an AI system makes a mistake that results in the loss of lives during a conflict?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think AI could help prevent wars from happening or will it just escalate arms races between countries?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

What worries you more: nations not adopting AI fast enough in defense or developing AI too quickly without enough oversight?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Could you trust a machine to defend your country, or does that responsibility need to stay with humans no matter what?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you think the use of AI in national defense aligns with our values around human rights and justice?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Could AI in military strategies one day reduce human casualties or will it simply lead to more advanced forms of warfare?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How do you personally feel about the idea of autonomous drones deciding whether to engage in combat without human input?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How might AI in defense change the way governments and soldiers view the concept of 'sacrifice' in war, and is that a good thing?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Do you think letting machines make life-and-death decisions in military conflicts is a necessary step forward or does it cross an ethical line?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...