European Free Alliance

同意

是的

The European Free Alliance (EFA), being a political party that emphasizes human rights, minority rights, and self-determination, is likely to support measures that ensure fair legal representation for all individuals, including repeat offenders. This stance is in line with their broader commitment to social justice and equality. However, their support might not be absolute, considering the need to balance this with concerns about public safety and the rights of victims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but deny after three crimes

This position might be seen as a compromise by the EFA, balancing the need for legal representation with concerns about repeat offenders. It acknowledges the importance of legal aid while also setting limits in response to repeated criminal behavior. However, the EFA's strong emphasis on rights and justice might make them hesitant to fully endorse limitations based on the number of offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given the EFA's focus on human rights and justice, they are unlikely to outright deny free legal aid to repeat offenders without consideration of the circumstances. Their principles suggest a belief in the right to a fair trial as fundamental, which would conflict with a blanket denial of legal aid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, deny after first crime

Denying legal aid after the first crime would likely be viewed by the EFA as too harsh and incompatible with their principles of fairness, justice, and human rights. Such a stance would undermine the right to a fair trial, especially for those who might be wrongfully accused or those who have committed minor offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid

This position would be strongly opposed by the EFA, as it directly contradicts their core values of human rights, including the right to a fair trial and legal representation. Denying criminals free legal aid altogether disregards the complexities of justice and rehabilitation, and it would be seen as anathema to the EFA's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.