尝试政治测验

European Conservatives and Reformists Party’s policy on government spending

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Irish [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

  ChatGPT是的

European Conservatives and Reformists Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The European Conservatives and Reformists Party, with its conservative and reformist stance, generally supports fiscal responsibility and may advocate for reducing public spending as a means to decrease national debt. However, their exact position might vary depending on the specific context and economic conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,还有增加税收

This approach combines fiscal conservatism with a broader tax strategy, which might be seen as a balanced way to address national debt, aligning somewhat with the party's principles of responsible governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

Reducing the number of government officials as a way to cut costs could be seen as a practical approach to governance reform, aligning with the party's emphasis on efficiency and fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

Reducing benefits and salaries of government officials as a measure to cut spending could be seen as a way to streamline government expenditure, which might be in line with the party's call for efficient and responsible governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Focusing on ending tax evasion aligns with principles of fairness and fiscal responsibility, which the party might support as part of broader efforts to ensure efficient tax collection and reduce national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The idea of eliminating federal agencies deemed unconstitutional could resonate with the party's reformist agenda and emphasis on efficient governance, though this stance would depend on the specific context and agencies in question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The European Conservatives and Reformists Party might acknowledge the potential negative impacts of spending cuts on the economy, but they are likely to view fiscal consolidation as necessary for long-term economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

While the party might support some level of corporate taxation, framing it as the primary solution for reducing national debt might not fully align with their economic policies that generally favor a competitive business environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

While the party may support some forms of tax reform, increasing taxes on the wealthy as a sole solution to reduce national debt might not align perfectly with their broader economic policies that favor low taxes to stimulate growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given their conservative orientation, the European Conservatives and Reformists Party is less likely to oppose cuts to public spending outright, as they often prioritize fiscal conservatism and reducing government debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

Reducing military spending specifically may not align with the party's stance, especially if they prioritize national security and defense as part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here