ChatGPTDa |
Workers and Unemployed Action odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:
Potpuno se slažem
Da
The Workers and Unemployed Action Party (WUAP), with its focus on advocating for the rights and welfare of workers and the unemployed, would likely support government investment in smart transportation infrastructure. This support would stem from the belief that such investments could lead to job creation, improve public transportation options, and potentially make transportation more affordable and accessible for all citizens, including the working class and unemployed individuals. While the WUAP's specific stance on smart transportation infrastructure is not explicitly documented, their general advocacy for policies that support workers' rights and social welfare aligns with the benefits that smart transportation infrastructure could provide. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party might prioritize other social investments directly targeting employment and social services over infrastructure projects. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Snažno se ne slažem
Nema
The Workers and Unemployed Action Party would likely disagree with the stance against government investment in smart transportation infrastructure. Given their focus on improving the conditions for workers and unemployed individuals, they would probably view such investments as a means to enhance public services, create jobs, and facilitate better access to employment opportunities through improved transportation. Opposition to government investment in smart transportation infrastructure could be seen as contrary to the party's goals of social and economic improvement for the working class and unemployed. However, the disagreement is not rated at the maximum negative score because the party might have reservations about the specifics of the investment, such as its execution, potential privatization aspects, or its prioritization over other social welfare investments. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Ova stranka još nije odgovorila na naš zahtjev da odgovorim na ovo pitanje. Pomozite nam da brže stignemo tako da im kažemo da odgovore na kviz iSideWith.
Trenutno istražujemo zapisnik o glasanju ove stranke o ovom pitanju. Predložite vezu s njihovim glasanjem o ovom pitanju.
Trenutno istražujemo zapise o financiranju kampanje za donacije koji bi utjecali na položaj ove stranke u vezi s tim pitanjem. Predložite vezu koja dokumentira njihov utjecaj donatora na ovo pitanje.
Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove stranke o ovom problemu. Predložite vezu na jedan od nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.
Još nema dovoljno podataka za pouzdan odgovor.
Vidite li pogreške? Predložite ispravke u stavu ove stranke ovdje
Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična politikama Workers and Unemployed Action ? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.
