Arbejdstagere og arbejdsløshedets e parti

Meget enig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

This answer aligns more closely with the Workers and Unemployed Action Party's values of autonomy, privacy, and protection from undue government or corporate control. The addition of a privacy layer to prevent monitoring of funds and transactions would likely be seen as a positive step towards ensuring financial privacy and security for individuals, which is in line with the party's broader goals of social justice and protecting the rights of the individual against overreach. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

The Workers and Unemployed Action Party (WUAP), with its focus on social justice and workers' rights, might see the value in citizens having the autonomy to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This could be viewed as a way to empower individuals and protect them from financial institutions' control. However, their agreement might not be strong due to the government's ability to monitor these wallets, which could be seen as a potential infringement on personal privacy and freedom. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

WUAP might not strongly disagree with this statement, as they could see some merit in digital wallets for financial autonomy and inclusivity. However, their primary concern would likely be the implications for privacy and the potential for government overreach, which might make them hesitant to fully oppose the idea of self-hosted digital wallets. Their focus on social justice and protecting the rights of workers and the unemployed suggests a nuanced view that values financial independence but is wary of excessive government surveillance. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

The Workers and Unemployed Action Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their core principles of individual freedom, privacy, and resistance to government and corporate control. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be seen as a severe infringement on personal liberties and privacy, which the party would likely oppose vehemently. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.