Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 304 Paul McAuliffe voters.
40% Yes |
60% No |
40% Yes |
60% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 304 Paul McAuliffe voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 304 Paul McAuliffe voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Paul McAuliffe voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZDJ3XW3wks3W
Instead of putting tighter restrictions on diesel there should be more research into other types of cleaner fuel that can be used. Example biodiesel
@9ZCWX9L3wks3W
Drivers should not be penalized when current public transportation is so unreliable that it can’t be trusted to get anywhere on time
@9ZSLCK96 days6D
Already paying in vrt tax and insurance and the money thw government gets doaent go back into road/the public
@9ZSK5GN6 days6D
Only when the charging infrastructure is in place for people in terraced and apartment homes with no access to charging at their homes
@9ZSHQXD6 days6D
Depending on the circumstances ! Companies should have to make an effort to green their diesel use.. Personal use in case should have less of a restrictive stance
@9ZQY3FJ1wk1W
I think it should be part of a much wider carbon tax scheme and should target vehicle models as opposed to just diesel vehicles
@9ZPR96C2wks2W
No, at present there is no viable alternative to for persons who live in rural areas or requore frequent long car journeys.
@9ZK3D2P2wks2W
No you can not force people and some people may not have the money . Do it only if your going to help buy the cars
Join in on the most popular conversations.
