Restricting freedom of movement could mean tighter controls at borders to manage migration and security concerns. Proponents believe it’s necessary for national security, while opponents argue it undermines the fundamental EU principle of free movement and could harm the internal market.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
County
Region
Townland
Barony
Electoral Division
Response rates from 254 Castleknock voters.
56% Yes |
44% No |
56% Yes |
44% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 254 Castleknock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 254 Castleknock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Castleknock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NY8TH66mos6MO
Screening and behind the scene work should be done to a higher degree but it shouldnt be noticable on grounds
@9ZRX7FD7 days7D
No, but every EU country should have stronger border security, as a means of safety for their people
@9ZHBZ8B3wks3W
As long as it’s a vaild eu passport the person should be free to move
@9ZGSPPY3wks3W
Yes, but everyone has a right to freedom just for the first year or two should be more restrictive.
@9MWSQMX6mos6MO
No, legal immigrants with proper documentation that is deemed suitable by the government of the country that they want to live in the country is up to the country, not the EU.
@9MDH8RS 7mos7MO
No, we should be doing more to support peace and economic growth in countries migrants originate from.
@9ZF5CLS3wks3W
no but more vigilant checks need to be done on people entering the country
@9ZDM9GZ3wks3W
You can invest in and have better control and security without restricting movement
Join in on the most popular conversations.
