+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 265 Naas voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
62%
Yes
38%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 265 Naas voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 265 Naas voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Naas voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9K8V4MKanswered…9mos9MO

Yes. But not based on ability to screen for terrorism, it should be based on screening for any history of violent or sexual crimes

 @9NXPTSZanswered…6mos6MO

This is a tricky question as on the one hand yes terrorists must be screened but you can’t abandon those who need the help

 @9N6X374answered…6mos6MO

No, living in a high risk country is a reason to immigrate. Our government needs to improve it's ability to screen and implement deportation measures to anyone with a high profile.

 @9ZSVKZG answered…4 days4D

No but there should be some form of screening so we can see who is coming into our country and so people don’t think our country is a joke who will take everyone in

 @9ZSTLYKanswered…4 days4D

Banned is too strong of a word. Its also too vague. People should be allowed in but screened in a centre

 @9ZS363Sanswered…5 days5D

No, they should be allowed seek asylum but have to be documented/ vetted and we need to improve housing for natives

 @9ZRZZFNanswered…5 days5D

I don’t think they should be banned but definitely screened for criminal records and judged on accordingly

 @9ZRXHFKanswered…5 days5D

I believe the government should house everyone in the country including immigrants and then begin bringing more immigrants in when we have the capacity