Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.9k Crumlin voters.
32% Yes |
68% No |
19% Yes |
62% No |
13% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
5% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
1% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k Crumlin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k Crumlin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Crumlin voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@94RHZLJ2yrs2Y
Yes, for war crimes and other horrific crimes, but life sentence other wise as normal.
@8T3NV2H4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if imprisonment were also banned. Legal punishments should be quick and cheap, such as mutilation/tarring & feathering.
@97Q84D42yrs2Y
Yes, I do support for extreme crime or termism
@8XFLST73yrs3Y
the death penalty should be the last resort
@92Y8C6L3yrs3Y
No, for serious crimes like murder, convicts should be used in medical trials that are otherwise unsafe for general public.
@8CWNV9J3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and high treason, e.g Neo-Liberalism, Socialism.
@8XPKLLH3yrs3Y
In the case of child abuse and murder
@9ZW6GB22wks2W
I think life in prison is worse than death but I’m not opposed to the death penalty. If the victims want the death penalty or life in prison that should be the punishment for the offender unless evidence says otherwise.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
