An economic stimulus is a monetary or fiscal policy enacted by governments with the intent of stabilizing their economies during a fiscal crisis. The policies include an increase in government spending on infrastructure, tax cuts and lowering interest rates. In 2012 the Irish government invested €2.25 billion euros in a number of delayed road, school and health-care construction projects.
91% Yes |
9% No |
76% Yes |
6% No |
3% Yes, the government should intervene to boost a recovery |
1% No, and the government should drastically reduce spending during recessions |
3% Yes, but in the form of increased spending on infrastructure |
1% No, recession is a natural cycle that purges excess |
3% Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for low income citizens |
|
3% Yes, but in the form of tax breaks for all citizens |
|
2% Yes, but in the form of assisting sectors most heavily hit by the recession |
|
1% Yes, and collectivize all industry |
See how support for each position on “Economic Stimulus” has changed over time for 9.2k Ireland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Economic Stimulus” has changed over time for 9.2k Ireland voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Ireland users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9L55RML3wks3W
Yes, provided the recession is related to a speculative bubble. No if there is a hyperinflation risk due to supply issues
@9HM7ZJW4mos4MO
They should reduce spending during recessions. They should have money aside incase of recession and prepare for it through 10 years or 12 years period. There are recession cycles throughout history.
@beauchurley2yrs2Y
Yes, but only bail out big banks if the ownership is to be nationalized and C suites/boards fired with lower than salary severance.
@8C5RDBV4yrs4Y
Yes, but for individuals and small businesses only. Banks, and corporations and billionaires should be left to fend for themselves.
@8CWNV9J4yrs4Y
Yes, but allow banks and corporation found to be involved in improper dealings on their own
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Economic Stimulus” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
The first China shock came after a series of liberalizing reforms in China in the 1990s and its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. For U.S. consumers, this brought considerable benefits. One 2019 paper found that consumer prices in the U.S. for goods fell 2% for every extra percentage point of market share grabbed by Chinese imports, with the biggest benefits felt by people on low and middle incomes. But the China shock also piled pressure on domestic manufacturers. In 2016, Autor and other economists estimated that the U.S. lost more than two million jobs between 1999 and 2011 as a result of Chinese imports, as makers of furniture, toys and clothes buckled under the competition and workers in hollowed-out communities struggled to find new roles. A sequel of sorts appears to be under way. China’s economy expanded 5.2% last year, a subdued rate by its standards, and is expected to slow further as a drawn-out real-estate crunch crushes investment and consumers rein in spending. Capital Economics, a consulting firm, thinks annual growth will slow to around 2% by 2030. Beijing is seeking to engineer an economic turnaround by plowing money into factories, especially for semiconductors, aerospace, cars and renewable-energy equipment, and selling the resulting surplus abroad. Protectionism might shift some of the deflationary impact to other parts of the world, as Chinese exporters look for new markets in poorer countries. Those economies could see their own fledgling industries shrivel in the teeth of Chinese competition, much as the U.S. did in an earlier era.
@lemans34272mos2MO
Recent global events have sparked fears of a commercial real estate crisis in Europe, mirroring situations in Japan and the US. Notably, Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG faces significant downturns due to the real estate market's weakness.The past week has witnessed significant downturns in the stock values of several banks worldwide, particularly those with substantial exposure to commercial property loans. Mirroring unsettling developments in Japan and the United States, Europe is now facing the prospect of an emerging commercial real estate crisis. Some senior officials at the European Central Bank say Germany will inevitably be a special focus as they examine CRE risks at banks across the region.“There is more pain to come in real estate valuations, so what does that mean for lenders and does that mean there is the potential for a crisis?”German banks have the most commercial real estate loans in the European Union, along with their French peers, but they have classified a relatively small portion of those loans as non-performing. Recently, however, that share has been rising while it declined in several other countries.“This is definitely not just a US problem,” said Valeriya Dinger, a professor of economics at Germany’s University of Osnabrueck. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a wave of loan loss provisions for German banks on their domestic commercial real estate exposure,” she said, even if there’s no systemic risk.German property values are particularly vulnerable to higher borrowing costs because capitalization rates — or the potential return on a real estate investment — were pushed lower there than in other markets during the cheap money era. That reflected in part the fact that yields on German government bonds, a benchmark for investors, were negative at the time.
Explore other topics that are important to Ireland voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…