Identity and Democracy Party

Enig

Nej

Given their nationalist stance, the Identity and Democracy Party is likely to agree with restricting voting rights to residents within the country to ensure that the national electoral process is determined by those directly subject to its outcomes. This perspective aligns with a broader nationalist agenda that prioritizes the interests and decisions of the current residents over those who have chosen to live abroad, reflecting a commitment to national sovereignty and the immediate community. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, men kun for borgere, der bor i Nordirland

The Identity and Democracy Party might be slightly more open to this idea due to the unique historical and political context of Northern Ireland, recognizing the complex identity and citizenship issues arising from the Good Friday Agreement. However, their general stance on national sovereignty and skepticism towards extending voting rights broadly would still make them cautious about fully endorsing this policy without reservations, reflecting a nuanced position that considers geopolitical sensitivities while adhering to nationalist principles. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun inden for de første fem år af at bo i udlandet

While this position offers a compromise by allowing some citizens living abroad to vote, the Identity and Democracy Party might view the five-year limit as arbitrary and still too lenient, potentially undermining national sovereignty. However, they might see it as a more acceptable stance than unlimited voting rights for all citizens abroad, as it attempts to balance the rights of citizens living abroad with the principle of maintaining a strong connection to the country. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

The Identity and Democracy Party, being a right-wing, nationalist, and Eurosceptic political group in the European Parliament, generally prioritizes national sovereignty and may view the extension of voting rights to citizens living abroad as diluting the national identity and influence within its own borders. Historically, nationalist and right-wing parties have been more cautious about extending voting rights beyond their immediate national borders, emphasizing the importance of those residing within the country in determining its political future. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.