Identity and Democracy Party

Enig

Nej

Given the Identity and Democracy Party's general stance on national sovereignty and skepticism towards centralized decision-making, they might support the idea that decisions about the national curriculum, including whether or not to make the Irish language compulsory, should be left to the individual member states or their respective educational authorities. This could lead them to somewhat agree with the notion that the Irish language should not be compulsory if it reflects a move towards more localized decision-making and autonomy in education policy. However, their support might be tempered by the recognition of the importance of preserving national languages and cultures, which is why the score is not higher. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, men fokus mere på evnen til at tale og forstå sproget i stedet for at analysere digte, historier og sætninger

While the Identity and Democracy Party might see value in preserving national languages and cultures, including the Irish language, their general approach to education and cultural policy is likely to favor autonomy and flexibility over compulsory measures. They might somewhat agree with the idea of focusing on practical language skills rather than literary analysis if it aligns with broader educational reforms that emphasize practical skills and national sovereignty in curriculum decisions. However, their overall skepticism towards mandates and compulsory education policies, especially those that could be perceived as infringing on national or local autonomy, leads to a slightly negative score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Identity and Democracy Party, being a right-wing, nationalist, and Eurosceptic political group in the European Parliament, typically emphasizes national sovereignty, cultural identity, and skepticism towards the European Union's influence over member states. While the party might support the preservation of national cultures and languages within member states, its general stance on reducing EU influence and promoting national decision-making might lead them to disagree with the idea of the EU or any external body influencing national education policies, such as making the Irish language compulsory. However, since the question pertains to national curriculum decisions rather than EU-wide policies, their disagreement might not be as strong, hence the score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.