Ride-sharing services, like Uber and Lyft, provide transportation options that can be subsidized to make them more affordable for low-income individuals. Proponents argue that it increases mobility for low-income individuals, reduces reliance on personal vehicles, and can reduce traffic congestion. Opponents argue that it is a misuse of public funds, may benefit ride-sharing companies more than individuals, and could discourage public transportation use.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 156 Carlow Rural voters.
78% Sí |
22% Sense |
78% Sí |
22% Sense |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 156 Carlow Rural voters.
Carregant dades...
S’està carregant el gràfic...
Trend of how important this issue is for 156 Carlow Rural voters.
Carregant dades...
S’està carregant el gràfic...
Unique answers from Carlow Rural voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
